*Originally published by www.the-phone-book.com (now archived)
*Originally published by www.the-phone-book.com (now archived)
Looking for something to read? Want to find a book to give as a present? Here are my latest assortment of recommended reads. Some from the library, some read on my Kindle, others advance copies I’ve had from publishers (thank you). Most are recently published, a couple older and one is still to hit the shops. They include disturbing psychological thrillers, classic science fiction, brutal Manc noir and a breathtaking collage of family history. They all tell a great story which kept me hooked, turning the pages. And all the writers have a skill, an assurance with their prose which makes the read seamless. Enjoy.
Heart Shaped Bruise by Tanya Byrne
Ursula, Under by Ingrid Hill
The Language of Dying by Sarah Pinborough
There But For The by Ali Smith
Out Of A Clear Sky by Sally Hinchcliffe
The Murder Wall by Mari Hannah
The Cutting Season by Attica Locke
Flowers For Algernon by Daniel Keyes
Light Shining in the Forest by Paul Torday
Chamber Music by Tom Benn
*Originally published by www.the-phone-book.com (now archived)
In one of my first blogs I wrote that I had reservations about joining Twitter but soon became an addict. I love it now – I like the interaction with people, the humour, the way news breaks ahead of other channels, the help and advice and recommendations people share and the momentary glimpses into other people’s lives. Another thing I like about it is that I can flit in and out at whim, there’s no obligation or expectation on me to stay tweeting if I’ve other things (work/life) to do.
There are a few things I dislike though and I don’t think I’m alone – these are the things that turn me off and make it most unlikely that I’ll follow you:
People who only tweet ‘buy my book’ over and over and make no effort to connect.
People who only tweet ‘read my blog’ or ‘visit my site’ over and over etc.
People who do either of the above and ask me to RT.
People who I’ve had no interaction with who baldly ask me to follow them back.
I don’t know what you do but when I get a new follower I usually check them out to decide whether I’ll reciprocate, I go to their home page and see what their last dozen tweets have been about, what their interests are, if they might be good company on Twitter. If it’s all heavy ‘marketing’ style stuff I won’t bother following back. If their tweets are protected or they don’t have a profile picture or they only tweet once a year, I’m unlikely to follow them too.
In the guide Tweet Right by @nicolamorgan she likens Twitter to being at a party and I think that’s a good analogy, it’s a social network not an online store. That and the ‘never tweet anything you wouldn’t want to see up on an advertising hoarding’ are good advice I think. Another entertaining post on etiquette comes from @crimeficreader you can see that here.
Catch you later.
*Originally published by www.the-phone-book.com (now archived)
Recently I tweeted to ask my followers if there were any topics they’d like me to blog about and @JanetOkane (follow her on Twitter) wanted to know what it was like writing novels based on pre-existing TV characters. (I write the books based on the popular Scott and Bailey ITV1 cop series.) When Transworld editor Sarah Adams approached me to do the prequel to the show I’d three instinctive reactions: delight at the prospect, fear that I’d get it wrong and panic that I wouldn’t be able to do it by the deadline. Delight because I was already a fan of the series and loved the characters and tone. Fear for the same reason. We all assume that we are seeing a character on screen in the same fashion but what if my interpretation on the page turned out to be way off kilter?
After an initial meeting with Sally Wainwright and Di Taylor, the show’s creators, where we discussed the three central characters (Rachel, Janet and Gill) and agreed on the back stories I would cover and what my murder case would be, I began work. The first line came instinctively and captured the flavour of the book but was it too rough? Too blunt? A confab with my agent Sara set me right. But the fear for the rest of it remained and the only way to deal with this was to seek some reassurance before I’d completed the draft. Once I’d written a few chapters I sent them to Sally and Di for comments. They gave me a resounding thumbs up which was a massive relief and I carried on at full pelt. Every so often I emailed Sally with queries about the characters: did either Rachel or Janet like football (no), is Rachel’s dad alive (yes) and how long has Janet been married (25 years); to make sure I wasn’t veering off track or writing something that would demolish continuity with the television series.
The fact that I really liked the show was a huge help in writing the characters, they were three dimensional for me already. It wasn’t hard to imagine how they’d respond to the new traumas I dreamt up for them. Or what they’d say. Another advantage was that we share the same Manchester territory (one of the reasons that Transworld thought of me in the first place). So the local references, the landscape and the atmosphere are familiar to me as are the rhythms of speech and the things people say to each other. There was no need for research visits or hours spent online looking for locations or dialect words. No time either! Remaining true to the original also gave me licence to swear much more than I usually do in my work which was immensely enjoyable. Thankfully I must have been doing something right because after receiving delivery of the prequel, Dead To Me, Transworld commissioned a further two Scott and Bailey books. So I best get cracking…
